Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. One Nash Roadster

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 17, 1927No. Appeal 4PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Henderson, J.,

This proceeding arises under the Act of March 27, 1923, P. L. 34. A Nash automobile was seized in Cumberland County while in use for the transportation of intoxicating liquor. By appropriate proceedings in the Court of Quarter Sessions, it was condemned and ordered to be sold. Thereupon the Commercial Investment Trust, Inc., of New York City, presented a petition setting forth that about July 15, 1926, the Kruse Motors Company of Brooklyn, N. Y., entered into a conditional sale contract with one Louis Buttel of Brooklyn, under which the automobile referred to was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Farquhar v. McAlevy, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Huntingdon County1891
  2. Commonwealth v. One Studebaker Light Six CoupeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  3. Commonwealth v. One Ford TruckSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  4. Bretz v. DiehlSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WilliamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Commercial Banking Corp. v. BerkowitzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  3. Commonwealth v. One Chrysler CoupeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  4. Commonwealth v. BowersDelaware County Court of Quarter Sessions · 1930
  5. Commonwealth v. One 1935 Ford SedanAdams County Court of Quarter Sessions · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API