Legal Opinion
Commercial Banking Corp. v. Berkowitz
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided December 9, 1931No. Appeal 426PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Tbexleb, P, J.,
This was an action of replevin for an automobile brought by the Commercial Banking Corporation, an automobile finance company, against Joseph Berkowitz, the purchaser of the automobile in question under a conditional sale, and the Atlas Auto Painting Company in possession of the car when the writ was served.
The car was originally bought from an automobile company and the finance company took an assignment of the contract when it financed the deal for Berkowitz. The case was decided on' the pleadings, the court entering judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Green v. Van BuskirkSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Green v. Van BuskirkSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Commonwealth v. One Studebaker Light Six CoupeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Bank v. CarrSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
- Commonwealth v. One Five-Passenger Overland SedanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- First Nat. Bk. of Jamestown v. SheldonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Kaufmann & Baer v. Monroe Motor Line Transportation, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Carroll v. GoddingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Aid Investment & Discount, Inc. v. McNiff, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Cumberland County1949
- Discount & Credit Corp. v. Ortman, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1942
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.