Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. One Ford Truck

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 31, 1924No. Appeal, 46PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Gawthrop, J.,

The district attorney for Philadelphia County instituted a proceeding under the act of assembly, approved the 27th day of March, A. D. 1923, P. L. 34, for the forfeiture and condemnation of the defendant truck, on the ground that it was being used on September 27,1923, for the transportation of intoxicating liquor in violation, of that act. Edson and Company, appellants, filed an answer admitting that at the time of the seizure of the truck it contained five barrels of alcohol, denying that the liquor was being transported, and averring that they became the owners of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jackson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1924
  2. Commonwealth v. Klein GoodsteinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  3. Backer v. HookCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1924

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Premier Cereal & Beverage Co. v. Pennsylvania Alcohol Permit BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  2. Commonwealth v. One 1957 Chevrolet SedanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  3. Commonwealth v. One Studebaker SedanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Commonwealth v. One Nash RoadsterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  5. Commonwealth v. Reo Speed WagonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1925

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API