Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. One Chrysler Coupe

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 19, 1930No. Appeal 326PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Kellee, J.,

The question at issue in this appeal is whether the seller of an automobile under a conditional sales contract is entitled to a return of the automobile, which had been seized as forfeited to the Commonwealth while being used by the buyer in the unlawful transportation of intoxicating liquors, on proof that such unlawful use was without the knowledge and consent of the seller. Appellant, as assignee from the seller of the conditional sales contract, stands no higher than the seller himself.

By the Act of .March 27, 1923, P. L. 34, which was the legislation enacted by this…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Patsone v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Dobbins's Distillery v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Commonwealth v. One Studebaker Light Six CoupeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  4. Forrest v. Nelson Bros.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1885
  5. Commonwealth v. One Ford TruckSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1924

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. One Dodge SedanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Commonwealth v. One Studebaker SedanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. Commercial Banking Corp. v. BerkowitzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  4. Young v. Kipe, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Franklin County1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API