Doe v. Nestle, S.A.
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS ARCHER-DANIELS-MIDLAND CO., NESTLE U.S.A., AND CAR-GILL INC.’S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(6) FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM
STEPHEN V. WILSON, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
On July 14, 2005, Plaintiffs John Doe I, John Doe II, John Doe III, and Global Exchange (collectively “Plaintiffs”) 1 filed this class action for damages and injunctive relief. On July 10, 2009, Plaintiffs filed a first amended complaint. The amended complaint asserts causes of action under the Aien Tort Statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1350; the…
2Cases cited92 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Wang v. OCZ Technology Group, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2011
- In Re Chiquita Brands International, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2011
- Institute of Cetacean Research v. Sea Shepherd Conservation SocietyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2012
- Doe I v. Cisco Systems, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
- Shimari v. CACI Premier Technology, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.