Legal Opinion
Wang v. OCZ Technology Group, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided October 14, 2011No. C 11-1415 PSGPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING-IN-PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS WITH LEAVE TO AMEND; ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STRIKE
PAUL S. GREWAL, United States Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff James Wang (“Wang”) brings the instant putative class action on behalf of himself and purchasers of OCZ Technology Agility 2 and Vertex 2 solid state drives (“SSDs”) during the relevant class period, beginning sometime after January 1, 2011.1 Wang alleges that Defendant OCZ Technology Group, Inc. (“OCZ”) made material misrepresentations as to the capacity and performance of the Agility 2 and Vertex 2 SSD products, and that…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Frenzel v. AliphcomDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
- In re Conagra Foods, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2014
- Ehret v. Uber Technologies, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
- Anderson v. Jamba Juice Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2012
- Richardson v. L'Oreal USA, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2013
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.