Legal Opinion
Doe I v. Cisco Systems, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided September 5, 2014No. Case No. 5:11-CV-02449-EJDPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[Re: Docket Item No. 117]
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
EDWARD J. DAVILA, United States District Judge
Presently before the Court is Defendant Cisco Systems, Inc. (“Cisco”), John Chambers (“Chambers”), and Fredy Cheung’s (“Cheung”) (collectively, “Defendants”) •Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint. See Docket Item No. 117.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs are U.S. and Chinese citizens and practitioners of Falun Gong, a religious practice. See Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”), Docket Item No. 113 ¶ 1. Doe I, II, III, IV, V, VI, Roe VII, Roe VIII, and Doe IX are' residents…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Lee v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Luis Mujica v. Airscan Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Cisco Systems, Inc. v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2026
- Luis Mujica v. Airscan Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Luis Mujica v. Airscan Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014