Legal Opinion

Brinkley v. Motor Vehicles Division

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 14, 1980No. 7545-L, CA 16264PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C. J.

Petitioner initiated this proceeding pursuant to ORS 482.560 for de novo circuit court review of defendant’s suspension of his driver’s license because of petitioner’s refusal to submit to a Breathalyzer test. The circuit court granted petitioner’s motion for summary judgment, ruling petitioner was not validly under arrest when he was asked to submit to the test. Defendant appeals. We find that there remained a material issue of fact, and therefore reverse and remand.

On April 5,1978 a police officer of the City of Hines cited petitioner into municipal court for driving under the influence of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. ClomanOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Hillman v. Northern Wasco County PUDOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  3. SEALE v. McKennonOregon Supreme Court · 1959

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Pooler v. Motor Vehicles DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. CharlesworthCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  3. Advocates for Effective Regulation v. City of EugeneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  4. Pooler v. Motor Vehicles DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  5. Sims v. Besaw's CaféCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API