Advocates for Effective Regulation v. City of Eugene
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.
Plaintiffs, a number of businesses operating in the City of Eugene, brought this action challenging the validity of the “Right to Know Initiative” (Initiative), a voter-approved amendment to the Eugene City Charter that imposes fees and reporting requirements on users of hazardous substances. The trial court upheld the validity of the Initiative. We conclude that three articles in the Initiative are invalid and therefore reverse and remand in part and affirm in part.
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
The electorate of the City of Eugene (City) enacted Measure 20-75, an amendment to the Eugene City Charter…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- City of La Grande v. Public Employes Retirement BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- City of La Grande v. Public Employes Retirement BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Brown v. Oregon State BarOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- Ecumenical Ministries v. Oregon State Lottery CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1994
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Doe v. Medford School District 549CCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- At&T Communications of Pacific Northwest, Inc. v. City of EugeneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- Ashland Drilling, Inc. v. Jackson CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- Homebuilders Ass'n v. Tualatin Hills Park & Recreation DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
- City of Corvallis v. State of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.