Legal Opinion

Roberson v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided March 14, 2014No. 1:13-cv-00844PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

SWEENEY, Judge

In this action, plaintiff Carol Sue Roberson seeks to recover damages based on what she claims was a wrongful response from the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) when she submitted an entry in an FTC-sponsored contest. Because the court lacks jurisdiction over a portion of plaintiff s complaint and because plaintiff fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted for the remain der of the complaint, the court dismisses plaintiffs complaint.

I. BACKGROUND

As part of the America COMPETES Reauthorization Act of 2010, federal agencies “may carry out a program…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Frankel v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  2. Milgroom v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  3. Howell v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  4. Ilaw v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  5. Driessen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API