Legal Opinion

Howell v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided August 15, 2016No. 16-316CPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pro se Plaintiff; Subject Matter Jurisdiction; Proper Plaintiffs; Proper Defendants; Tort Claims; Criminal Claims; Fraud; Racketeering.

OPINION

HORN, J.

FINDINGS OF FACT

Pro se plaintiff Rosemarie Elizabeth Anne Howell filed a complaint with the United States Court of Federal Claims on behalf of herself, her spouse Brian P. Howell, “JANE DOE(S) and JOHN DOE(S) ‘bio-logical’ Ex-Rel(s) HOWELL(S),” and “ ‘The HOWELL FAMILY-OWNED “Sovereign” CORPORATION’, ‘As’ the Injured / ‘Legitimate’ / Heir / Owner / True Beneficiary / Person” on March 9, 2016. 1 Construed liberally, in the complaint, plaintiffs…

2Cases cited125 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

120 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Baistar Mechanical, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  2. Muchison v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
  3. Nottage v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
  4. Rodenbeck v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019
  5. Straw v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API