Howell v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
Pro se Plaintiff; Subject Matter Jurisdiction; Proper Plaintiffs; Proper Defendants; Tort Claims; Criminal Claims; Fraud; Racketeering.
OPINION
HORN, J.
FINDINGS OF FACT
Pro se plaintiff Rosemarie Elizabeth Anne Howell filed a complaint with the United States Court of Federal Claims on behalf of herself, her spouse Brian P. Howell, “JANE DOE(S) and JOHN DOE(S) ‘bio-logical’ Ex-Rel(s) HOWELL(S),” and “ ‘The HOWELL FAMILY-OWNED “Sovereign” CORPORATION’, ‘As’ the Injured / ‘Legitimate’ / Heir / Owner / True Beneficiary / Person” on March 9, 2016. 1 Construed liberally, in the complaint, plaintiffs…
2Cases cited125 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
120 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Baistar Mechanical, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Muchison v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
- Nottage v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Rodenbeck v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019
- Straw v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017