Legal Opinion
Frankel v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided August 27, 2014No. 1:13-cv-00546PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Contract case; Breach of contract; Bid protest; Motion to dismiss under RCFC 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6); Contest; Breach of contract; Bid protest — 1491(b)(2).
OPINION
ALLEGRA, Judge:
In this action, plaintiff seeks to recover damages based on a claimed breach of contract. That breach occurred, according to plaintiff, when the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) failed to comply with rules it established for evaluating proposals in a contest for developing a technological solution to the problem of automated “robocalls.” According to information he garnered through the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C.…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Sears v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Frankel v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Davinci Aircraft, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025
- Flint v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022
- Harvey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.