Legal Opinion

Ilaw v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided June 4, 2015No. 15-173CPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pro Se; In Forma Pauperis; Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction; Due Process; Civil Rights; Tort; Request to Transfer to District Court.

OPINION

HORN, J.

BACKGROUND

Pro se plaintiff Miguel Ilaw filed suit in this court on February 24, 2015, against the United States, Judge Lucy H. Koh of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, and Littler Men-delson, P.C. Plaintiff alleges violations of his constitutional rights under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments, as well as his civil rights under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985 (2012). He also alleges a “conspiratorial…

2Cases cited118 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

113 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ilaw v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
  2. Ilaw v. Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API