Legal Opinion

Hewes v. State Accident Insurance Fund

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 6, 1978No. 75-3792, CA 9997PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, J.

In this workers’ compensation case there are two essential issues: whether claimant has established her claim for aggravation and whether she is entitled to penalties and attorney fees for unreasonable delay in denying her claim. The first issue is purely factual. We affirm the Workers’ Compensation Board’s denial of the claim for aggravation. See Bowman v. Oregon Transfer Company, 33 Or App 241, 576 P2d 27 (1978).

Respecting the issue of penalties and attorney fees, the relevant facts are that claimant sustained a compensable injury to her neck and upper back in 1969. Her claim was closed in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bowman v. Oregon Transfer Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  2. Norgard v. Rawlinsons & New System LaundryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  3. Williams v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wetzel v. Goodwin Bros.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  2. Silsby v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  3. Spivey v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  4. Clark v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  5. Kosanke v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API