Legal Opinion

Bowman v. Oregon Transfer Co.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 20, 1978No. A 77 08 11159, CA 9259PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C. J.

This workers’ compensation case presents only fact questions.

Since this court was established in 1969 it has reviewed de novo, see Hannan v. Good Samaritan Hosp., 4 Or App 178, 471 P2d 831, 476 P2d 931 (1970), rev den (1971), literally hundreds of workers’ compensation cases — most of which, like the case at bar— presented only questions of fact. The vast majority of those decisions have been by opinions setting out in more or less detail the facts and the reasons for our decision.

In Sarty v. Forney, 12 Or App 251, 506 P2d 535 (1973), a case dealing with child custody, we said:

"A detailed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hannan v. Good Samaritan HospitalCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  2. Hannan v. Good Samaritan HospitalCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  3. Sarty v. ForneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Rogers v. State Accident Insurance FundOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Matter of Compensation of GrableOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Gettman v. State Accident Insurance FundOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. MavesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  5. Harwell v. Argonaut InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1984

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API