Legal Opinion

Norgard v. Rawlinsons & New System Laundry

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 19, 1977No. A-7702-01569, CA 8488PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C. J.

The issue in this workers’ compensation appeal is whether an insurer acts unreasonably, under ORS 656.262(8), thereby subjecting it to the payment of penalties by refusing to pay "compensation” consisting of medical expenses, pending review of a referee’s decision when the relevant rule of law is uncertain.

Claimant was injured in an industrial accident in April 1969. The insurer accepted claimant’s claim at that time. It was later apparently closed. Subsequently, in January 1974, claimant was hospitalized for low back pain which she contended was compensable as an exacerbation of her original…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kerley v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Wisherd v. Paul Koch Volkswagen, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1977

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Holton v. F.H. Stoltze Land & Lumber Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Avon Products, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Brown v. Argonaut Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  4. Ginter v. Woodburn United Methodist ChurchCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  5. Hewes v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API