Legal Opinion

Clark v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 26, 1981No. 77-13, CA 18335PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.

Claimant appeals from a Workers’ Compensation Board order reversing the hearing officer and holding that claimant’s aggravation claim had not been properly filed with State Accident Insurance Fund Corporation (SAIF) and, in any event, that the evidence did not establish that claimant had in fact suffered an aggravation of her prior back problems as opposed to a new injury. Three issues are raised on appeal: (1) Did the physician’s report sent to SAIF constitute an adequate filing? (2) If so, did claimant establish an aggravation of her earlier accepted injury? (3) Was the referee correct in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hewes v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  2. Compensation of Mavis v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Haret v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  2. Smith v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  3. Trevino v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  4. Haret v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API