Legal Opinion

Gollner v. Cram

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 14, 1960No. 37,817PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Dell, Chief Justice.

Plaintiff appeals from an order dismissing his action for damages allegedly resulting from the defendant’s failure to properly care for plaintiff’s cattle under a certain lease agreement.

On November 5, 1956, the parties entered into a written lease whereby plaintiff rented his farm to the defendant for a term of four years. One of the terms of the lease was as follows:

“It is understood and agreed that as partial consideration, Lessee shall pay to Lessor $1,000.00, payable as follows :
“$400.00 payable on or before Dec. 10, 1956, of each year.
“$600.00 payable by wintering 22…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Todhunter v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Sanderson v. NiemannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Gammel v. Ernst & ErnstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  4. Anderson v. Mikel Drilling Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  5. Bulau v. BulauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Hauser v. MealeySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  2. Indianhead Truck Line, Inc. v. Hvidsten Transport, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  3. Travelers Insurance Company v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  4. Price v. AmdalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  5. Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. WoodsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API