Legal Opinion

Ace Leasing, Inc. v. Boustead

Montana Supreme Court

Decided September 19, 2002No. 01-090PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rice

¶ 1 Appellant, Ace Leasing, Inc., appeals from the findings of fact and conclusions of law entered by the Eighteenth Judicial District Court, Gallatin County, holding that material changes in a leasing agreement exonerated Respondent, Mary Boustead, from her obligations as a guarantor for the lease. We affirm.

¶2 Appellant presents the following issues on appeal:

¶3 1. Did the District Court err in its findings of fact regarding ownership of the equipment, and alteration or cancellation of the agreement?

¶4 2. Did the District Court err in its legal conclusion that Boustead was exonerated from…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Infinity Insurance v. DodsonMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Moore v. WhiteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  3. Hampe v. MankeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Trifad Entertainment, Inc. v. AndersonMontana Supreme Court · 2001
  5. United States Building & Loan Ass'n v. BurnsMontana Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Baltrusch v. BaltruschMontana Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Beaver v. Montana Department of Natural Resources & ConservationMontana Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Peschel Family Trust v. ColonnaMontana Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Jackpot Farms v. Johns FarmsMontana Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Ace Leasing, Inc. v. BousteadMontana Supreme Court · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API