Legal Opinion

Trifad Entertainment, Inc. v. Anderson

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 2001No. 00-506PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Leaphart

¶1 Trifad Entertainment, Inc., (Trifad) and its majority shareholder, Joe Lee, Inc., (collectively Appellants) appeal from the Thirteenth Judicial District Court’s decision determining that Brad Anderson (Brad), Trifad’s minority shareholder, did not convert Trifad’s assets, that he did not breach the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing or fiduciary duties, and that he did not engage in malicious and fraudulent behavior warranting punitive damages pursuant to § 27-1-221, MCA. We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand.

¶2 The following issues are presented on appeal:

¶3 1) Did…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hansen v. 75 Ranch Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Eatinger v. JohnsonMontana Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Graham v. Clarks Fork National BankMontana Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Houdashelt v. LutesMontana Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Farmers State Bank v. Imperial Cattle Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1985

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Trustees of Indiana University v. BuxbaumMontana Supreme Court · 2003
  2. In Re Wal-Mart Wage & Hour Employment Practices LitigationDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2007
  3. Blixseth v. Kirschner (In Re Yellowstone Mountain Club, LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Montana · 2010
  4. Salminen v. Morrison & FramptonMontana Supreme Court · 2014
  5. United States v. BedonieDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2004

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API