Legal Opinion

Infinity Insurance v. Dodson

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 2000No. 99-168PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Nelson

¶1 The Appellants, Holly Dodson (Dodson), Kortnee Azure (Azure) and Martha Vannatta (Vannatta), appeal an order issued by the Twelfth Judicial District Court, Hill County, which granted summary judgment in favor of Infinity Insurance Company (Infinity). We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

¶2 Dodson and Azure are jointly represented on appeal by the same counsel, while Vannatta is represented by her own counsel. Thus, two separate sets of briefs were filed by the parties referred to herein as the Appellants. Although framed differently, the issues on appeal can be consolidated and…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Bruner v. Yellowstone CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Grossman v. State, Dept. of Natural ResourcesMontana Supreme Court · 1984
  3. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. ThompsonMontana Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Jurd v. Pacific Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Iowa Mutual Insurance v. DavisMontana Supreme Court · 1988

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. State v. TriplettMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Lee v. USAA Casualty InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Montana Vending, Inc. v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State v. PriceMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Winter v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2014

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API