Legal Opinion

Grays Harbor Commercial Co. v. Fifer

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 23, 1917No. 14139PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from an order of the superior court for King county, Tallman, J., entered November 6, 1916, appointing a receiver.

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

On October 31, 1916, the plaintiff brought a suit in the superior court of King county against L. R. Fifer, doing business as the L. R. Fifer Lumber Company. The complaint is in.form the one ordinarily used in stating an action at law upon an open account. The capacity of the corporation to sue is set out, and the last paragraph of the complaint alleges that the defendant has become indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of $160.08 for lumber and shingles purchased from it during the last three years preceding the *381commencement of the action. A demand is made for judgment for the $160.08,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Baker v. Administrator of BackusIllinois Supreme Court · 1863
  2. Estes v. . WilcoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  3. Vila v. Grand Island Electric Light, Ice & Cold Storage Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Pelzer, Rodgers & Co. v. HughesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1887
  5. Thompson v. AdamsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1906

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Hoiles v. WatkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Gypsy Oil Co. v. SchonwaldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. District No. 21 United Mine Workers of America v. BourlandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
  4. KING COUNTY DEPT. v. Northwest Defenders Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  5. King County Department of Community & Human Services v. Northwest Defenders Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API