District No. 21 United Mine Workers of America v. Bourland
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Hart, J.,
(after stating the facts). The case not being here on appeal, but upon prohibition, our consideration must be confined to the question of the power of the chancery court to appoint a receiver in a case of this sort. The office of the writ of prohibition is to restrain an inferior tribunal from proceeding in a matter not within its jurisdiction; but it is never granted unless the inferior tribunal has clearly exceeded its authority and the party applying for it has no other protection against the wrong that shall be done by such usurpation.. Russell v. Jacoway, 33 Ark. 191; and…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- United Mine Workers v. Coronado Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Baker v. Administrator of BackusIllinois Supreme Court · 1863
- Walls v. BrundidgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
- State ex rel. Merriam v. RossSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
- Monette Road Improvement District v. DudleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Westbrook v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
- Davis v. SchimmelSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
- Order of Railway Conductors of America v. BandySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
- Lafargue v. WaggonerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
- Bassett v. BourlandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.