Legal Opinion

Hoiles v. Watkins

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1927No. 20384PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.

The appointment of receivers is regulated in this state by statute. Section 11894, General Code, provides:

UA receiver may be appointed by the Supreme Court or a judge thereof, the Court of Appeals, or a judge thereof in his district, the common pleas court or a judge thereof in his district, or the probate court, in causes pending in such courts respectively, in the following cases:

“1. In an action by a vendor to vacate a fraudulent purchase of property, or by a creditor to subject property or a fund to his claim, or between partners or others jointly owning or interested in any property or…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Hawes v. OaklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Vila v. Grand Island Electric Light, Ice & Cold Storage Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  3. United North & South Oil Co. v. MeredithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  4. Kokernot v. RoosCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  5. Allen v. Montana Refining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1924

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Brown v. San Francisco Ball Club, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1950
  2. Malloy v. Malloy Color Lab, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Equity Centers Development Co. v. South Coast Centers, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Superior Oil Corp. v. MatlockCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
  5. Granada Investments, Inc. v. DWG Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1993

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API