Legal Opinion

Geo. S. Bush & Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided June 3, 1954No. C. D. 1620PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rao, Judge:

Magnesium castings in the form of unfinished clutch housings, magneto housings, and fan housings constitute the subject matter of the instant controversy. This merchandise was classified by the collector of customs at the port of Seattle, Wash., as articles, wares, or manufactures of magnesium, not specially provided for, and assessed with duty at the rate of 20 cents per pound on the metallic magnesium content, plus 10 per centum ad valorem, pursuant to the provisions of paragraph 375 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 82 Treas.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Oxford University Press, N. Y., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1948
  2. Montague Machine Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1944

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Avins Industrial Products Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1974
  2. J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  3. Border Brokerage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
  4. Acme Shear Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975
  5. Herman D. Steel Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API