Legal Opinion

Oxford University Press, N. Y., Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided March 5, 1948No. C. D. 1088PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lawbence, Judge:

The question for our determination here is whether an importation invoiced as “Printing Plates (Electro Shells), for ‘O. S. A. Craig-Shakespeare’ ” was properly classified by the collector of customs under the provision in paragraph 397, Tariff Act of 1930, for ■—

Articles or wares not specially provided for * * * if composed wholly or in chief value of iron, * * * copper, * * * or other metal, but not plated with platinum, gold, or silver, or colored with gold lacquer, whether partly or wholly manufactured, 45 per centum ad valorem.

Plaintiff makes the following claims in its…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Arthur v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Greely's Administrator v. BurgessSupreme Court of the United States · 1856
  3. United States v. LyonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  4. Carter v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
  5. Bache v. Central Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1917

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United Enterprises v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  2. Geo. S. Bush & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
  3. Border Brokerage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  4. Aceto Chemical Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  5. Hudson Merchandise Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API