J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Rosenstein, Judge:
This case involves the proper tariff classification of certain cutting forms classified as manufactures of metal, not specially provided for, under paragraph 397, Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Sixth Protocol of Supplementary Concessions to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T.D. 54108, and assessed with duty thereunder at the rate of 19 per centum ad valorem.
Plaintiff claims by amendment to the protest, that the merchandise is properly dutiable as parts of machines, not specially provided for, under paragraph 372 of said Act, as modified by the 1960-61…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. LyonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
- United States v. American Bead Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
- United States v. RigaU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1909
- Lodge Spark Plug Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
- Davis Turner & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1944
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Border Brokerage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
- Acme Shear Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975
- James G. Wiley Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
- World Engines, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970