Border Brokerage Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Kosenstein, Judge:
At issue in this case is the classification of articles, imported in November 1963, invoiced in protest 67/47785, one of the two consolidated protests herein, as “Cannery Slices - Bottoms,” and in protest 67/47786 as “Cannery Slices - Sides”, which were assessed for duty at 16% per centum ad valorem under the provision of TSUS item 207.00 for “Articles not specially provided for, of wood” and are claimed to be entitled to duty-free entry under TSUS item 666.00 as parts of agricultural implements or, alternatively, dutiable at 10 per centum ad valorem under TSUS item 240.01…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. Stone & Downer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- United States v. LyonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
- United States v. American Bead Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
- Armbee Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
- United States v. RigaU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1909
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- F. W. Myers & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
- Acme Shear Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975