Legal Opinion
Woo Chul Lee v. Interinsurance Exchange of Automobile Club
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 31, 1996No. B089335PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CROSKEY, Acting P. J.
Three years ago, in Barnes v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. (1993) 16 Cal.App.4th 365 [20 Cal.Rptr.2d 87] (hereafter, Barnes), this court considered, among other issues, the question of whether a policyholder of a mutual insurance company can object to, or seek judicial assistance to control, the insurer’s maintenance, management and disbursement of surplus funds. We answered that question in the negative. (Id. at pp. 378-380.)
The present action, brought by subscribers and former subscribers of the Interinsurance Exchange of the Automobile Club of Southern…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Reserve Insurance Co. v. PisciottaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Admiral InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Farmers Insurance Exchange v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Troyk v. Farmers Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
- True v. RoblesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- Bell v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Lamden v. La Jolla Shores Clubdominium Homeowners Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Berg & Berg Enterprises, LLC v. BoyleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.