Legal Opinion

Lamden v. La Jolla Shores Clubdominium Homeowners Ass'n

California Supreme Court

Decided August 9, 1999No. S070296PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WERDEGAR, J.

A building in a condominium development suffered from termite infestation. The board of directors of the development’s community association 1 decided to treat the infestation locally (“spot-treat”), rather than fumigate. Alleging the board’s decision diminished the value of her unit, the owner of a condominium in the development sued the community association. In adjudicating her claims, under what standard should a court evaluate the board’s decision?

As will appear, we conclude as follows: Where a duly constituted community association board, upon reasonable…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Harris v. Capital Growth Investors XIVCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Delaney v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Rojo v. KligerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Ann M. v. Pacific Plaza Shopping CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Levandusky v. One Fifth Avenue Apartment Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1990

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Pinnacle Museum Tower Ass'n v. Pinnacle Market Development (US), LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Berg & Berg Enterprises, LLC v. BoyleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. Villa De Las Palmas Homeowners Ass'n v. TerifajCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Tierra Ranchos Homeowners Ass'n v. KitchukovCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  5. Halebian v. BervMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API