Legal Opinion

V. O. Machinoimport v. Clark Equipment Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 19, 1951No. 47-775PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEINFELD, District Judge.

The plaintiff is a commercial organization existing under the laws of the Union of the Soviet Socialist Republics with its principal office in Moscow, U. S. S. R. It neither engages in nor does it have a place of business in the United States. All of its officers and employees are citizehs and residents of Russia and all records and documents pertaining to the present action are located in Moscow.

In July 1946, following negotiations conducted principally in Washington, D. C., through representatives of the Soviet Purchasing Commission, plaintiff entered into a written…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Cohen v. Pennsylvania R. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1939
  3. Fruit Growers Co-Op. v. California Pie & Baking Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1942
  4. Hawaiian Airlines, Ltd. v. Trans-Pacific Airlines, Ltd.District Court, D. Hawaii · 1948
  5. Sekely v. SalkindDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1950

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Farmer v. Arabian American Oil Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1962
  2. Morrison Export Co. v. GoldstoneDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1952
  3. Salitan v. CarrilloNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Kleppinger v. Texas Department of TransportationDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2012
  5. Kainz v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1954

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API