Legal Opinion
Kainz v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided February 17, 1954No. 51 C 438PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOFFMAN, District Judge.
This is a suit for the recovery of treble damages for unlawful price and services discrimination under the Robinson-Patman Act, 38 Stat. 730, 731, 737; 49 Stat. 1526, 1528; 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 12, 13, 13a, 15, 26, in which the plaintiffs have filed objections to written interrogatories propounded by the defendant Anheuser-Busch, Incorporated, under Rule 33, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. The three original plaintiffs commenced the action as a spurious class suit within the provisions of Rule 23(a)(3), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The propriety of using…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Kainz v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1952
- Aktiebolaget Vargos v. ClarkDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1949
- Cinema Amusements, Inc. v. Loew's, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1947
- V. O. Machinoimport v. Clark Equipment Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1951
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Henry Hendler, Paul Garrett, Tillie Goldring, as Trustees, and Henry Hendler and Irving Gronsky v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Coy v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Charles Sales Corp. v. RovengerSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
- United States v. NYSCO Laboratories, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1960
- Carlson Companies, Inc. v. Sperry & Hutchinson Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1974
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.