Hawaiian Airlines, Ltd. v. Trans-Pacific Airlines, Ltd.

McLAUGHLIN, District Judge.

Prior phases of this litigation are to be found reported in 73 F.Supp. 68 and TransPacific Airlines v. Inter-Island Steam Nav. Co., D.C., 75 F.Supp. 690.

There is now before the court for disposition in advance of trial upon the antitrust cross-complaint, an amended motion under Rule 34 as amended, 28 U.S.C.A. Needless to say, it is firmly resisted.

The grant or denial in whole or in part of this motion rests in the court’s judicial discretion.1 Because at this stage of the litigation the ruling upon the motion is unappealable, because the issue is one of first…