Legal Opinion

Sekely v. Salkind

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided November 6, 1950PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McGOHEY, District Judge.

The plaintiff having brought suit here cannot now complain that he is required to be examined here. But the time of his examination should be fixed so as not to require him to break existing commitments in Mexico. Accordingly, the motion to set aside the notice for his examination here is denied. But the examination will not be held until the second week of December, 1950. Furthermore, it will be held at the United States Court House in this district unless the parties agree on some other place. The motion to require defendants to defray plaintiff’s expenses is denied.

T…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Smith v. BentleyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1949
  2. Society of Independent Motion Picture Producers v. United Detroit Theatres Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1948

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. V. O. Machinoimport v. Clark Equipment Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1951
  2. Johnson v. CoulterHigh Court of American Samoa · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API