Mataraza v. City of Euclid
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Mary Eileen Kilbane, Judge.
{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, Kim Mataraza, appeals from the order of the trial court that awarded summary judgment to the city of Euclid, thereby reversing her award of workers’ compensation surviving-spouse death benefits. For the reasons set forth below, we reverse the judgment and remand the cause for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
{¶ 2} Mataraza’s late husband, James Mataraza (referred to herein as “James” or “the decedent”), began working as a firefighter for the city of Euclid in 1991. On January 19, 2005, James, who was then 41 years old,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
- Vahila v. HallOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance v. Guman Bros. FarmOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Jackson v. Alert Fire & Safety Equipment, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
- Village v. General Motors Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Mataraza v. City of EuclidOhio Court of Appeals · 2011