Legal Opinion

Mataraza v. City of Euclid

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 9, 2011No. 95830PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Mary Eileen Kilbane, Judge.

{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, Kim Mataraza, appeals from the order of the trial court that awarded summary judgment to the city of Euclid, thereby reversing her award of workers’ compensation surviving-spouse death benefits. For the reasons set forth below, we reverse the judgment and remand the cause for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

{¶ 2} Mataraza’s late husband, James Mataraza (referred to herein as “James” or “the decedent”), began working as a firefighter for the city of Euclid in 1991. On January 19, 2005, James, who was then 41 years old,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Vahila v. HallOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance v. Guman Bros. FarmOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Jackson v. Alert Fire & Safety Equipment, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Village v. General Motors Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mataraza v. City of EuclidOhio Court of Appeals · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API