Legal Opinion

Village v. General Motors Corp.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1984No. 84-222PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJ. P. Celebrezze, J.

The question before this court is whether an injury caused by the performance of an employee’s job duties, which develops gradually over a period of time, is a compensable injury within the meaning of R.C. 4123.01(C). We feel that the purpose of workers’ compensation, as reflected in the statutory language, the legislative history and the judicial history surrounding R.C. 4123.01, is best served by allowing compensation to an employee for such an injury. In so holding, it is necessary to overrule the case of Bowman v. National Graphics Corp. (1978), 55 Ohio St. 2d 222 [9 O.O.3d 159], as well…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Malone v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Bowman v. National Graphics Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Czarnecki v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Ratner v. DaughertyOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Peavy v. FlowersOhio Supreme Court · 1979

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Bailey v. Republic Engineered Steels, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2001
  2. McCrone v. Bank One Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Matter of MusickSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
  4. Beagle v. WaldenOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Ryan v. ConnorOhio Supreme Court · 1986

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API