Pecker v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtLongo, J.
This appeal is taken by the plaintiffs, Richard C: Pecker and Vernon C. Pecker, from a judgment for the defendant, the Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, hereinafter referred to as Aetna. Judgment was rendered after Aetna had demurred to the plaintiffs’ complaint and its motion for judgment on the demurrer was sustained by the trial court. As “[a] demurrer admits all facts well pleaded”; Covino v. Pfeffer, 160 Conn. 212, 214, 276 A.2d 895; see State v. LaSelva, 163 Conn. 229, 230-31, 303 A.2d 721; we treat as admitted the following allegations which appear in the plaintiffs’ *445complaint: On…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Harleysville Mutual Casualty Co. v. BlumlingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Sellers v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1966
- Bryant v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1965
- Moore v. Hartford Fire Insurance Company GroupSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Vernon v. Harleysville Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1964
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- American Universal Insurance v. DelGrecoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Dodd v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Haynes v. Yale-New Haven HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Mazziotti v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Nationwide Insurance v. GodeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.