Legal Opinion

Par Painting, Inc. v. Greenhorne & O'Mara, Inc.

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided January 9, 2001No. AC 19013PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PELLEGRINO, J.

The plaintiff, PAR Painting, Inc., appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered after the granting of the motion by the defendants, Greenhome & O’Mara, Inc., and two of its employees, Tony Guerin, Jr., and James Barranger, to set aside the jury’s verdict in this action for tortious interference with business and contractual relations. The plaintiff claims that the court improperly determined that the evidence was insufficient to support the jury’s findings that the defendants had tortiously interfered with the plaintiffs business relationships, that the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Blake v. LevySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  2. Daley v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  3. Sportsmen's Boating Corp. v. HensleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  4. Associated Investment Co. Ltd. Partnership v. Williams Associates IVSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  5. Lawson v. Whitey's Frame ShopSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Downes-Patterson Corp. v. First National Supermarkets, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  2. Larobina v. Home Depot, USA, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  3. Gilliard v. Van-Court Property Management Services, Ltd.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  4. Ipacs v. CranfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  5. Visoky v. LavoieConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API