Legal Opinion
Ipacs v. Cranford
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 4, 2001No. AC 20370PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SPEAR, J.
In this personal injury action, the defendants, David Cranford and the Salvation Army,1 appeal from the judgment, rendered after a jury trial, in favor of the plaintiff, Kathleen Ipacs. The defendants claim that the trial court improperly (1) denied their posttrial motion challenging the verdict as against the weight of the evidence, and (2) failed to instruct the jury on the plaintiffs duties and responsibilities as an operator of a bicycle on a public highway. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The jury reasonably could have found the following facts. On August 19,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Purzycki v. Town of FairfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- State v. DaySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Tryon v. Town of North BranfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Opotzner v. BassConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Marshall v. O'KeefeConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- McDermott v. Calvary Baptist ChurchConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Bojila v. ShramkoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Caprood v. Atlanta Casualty Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Colon v. Padro, No. Cv00 037 26 30 (Dec. 18, 2002)Connecticut Superior Court · 2002
- Marella v. Vazzano, No. Cv35 74 70 S (Oct. 9, 2002)Connecticut Superior Court · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.