Legal Opinion

Jedneak v. Minneapolis General Electric Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 2, 1942No. 33,037PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hilton, Justice.

Action to enjoin and to recover damages for the maintenance of a nuisance. Defendant, the Minneapolis General Electric Company, is a public utility whose power plant is located adjacent to the Mississippi River in northeast Minneapolis in an area zoned by the city for heavy industrial use. Plaintiffs, who since 1923 have lived nearby, claim that cinders unnecessarily escape from defendant’s smokestacks onto plaintiffs’ premises, interfering with their physical enjoyment of life. A similar claim is made as to dust blown from defendant’s coal piles, -which for many years have…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Brede v. Minnesota Crushed Stone Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  2. Romer v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
  3. Stuhl v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  4. Eaton v. KlimmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Roukovina v. Island Farm Creamery Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Riter v. Keokuk Electro-Metals CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1957
  2. Fuchs v. Curran Carbonizing and Engineering Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1955
  3. Louisville Refining Company v. MuddCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1960
  4. Citizens for a Safe Grant v. Lone Oak Sportsmen's Club, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
  5. Stockdale v. Agrico Chemical Co., Div. of Con. Oil Co.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API