Legal Opinion
Louisville Refining Company v. Mudd
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
Decided October 7, 1960PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PALMORE, Judge.
The appellee, Dorothy Mudd, won a verdict and judgment awarding her $1,000 for -diminution of the market value of her home as the result of an alleged permanent nuisance created and maintained by the appellant, Louisville Refining Company (hereinafter called the Company), in the operation of its petroleum refinery. The Company moves for an appeal, contending it was entitled to a directed verdict and judgment as a matter of law. It is further contended that the instructions did not fairly submit the proper issues to the jury.
The dispute involves neighboring prop-erties in the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kentucky-Ohio Gas Co. v. BowlingCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
- Patterson v. Peabody Coal Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1954
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
- Kentucky & West Virginia Power Co. v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941
- United Fuel Gas Co. v. SawyersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Lynn Mining Co. v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1965
- Harris v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1973
- Rockwell International Corp. v. WilhiteCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2003
- Klutey v. Commonwealth, Department of HighwaysCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1968
- Thomas W. Huffman v. United States of America United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.