Legal Opinion
Eaton v. Klimm
California Supreme Court
Decided January 31, 1933No. Docket No. S.F. 14363PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.
Plaintiffs sought an injunction to enjoin the Board of Health of the City and County of San Francisco from carrying into effect a resolution adopted by said board declaring the structures occupied by the plaintiffs, as partners in the business of general contractors for street improvement work, to be a nuisance and ordering that said structures be vacated and demolished, and further to enjoin William Quinn, as Chief of Police of said city, from taking summary action against said plaintiffs for their failure to comply with said order. •
It appears from the complaint that in 1916 the plaintiffs,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. Detroit White Lead Works Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Williams v. Blue Bird Laundry Co.California Court of Appeal · 1927
- Vowinckel v. N. Clark & SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Fendley v. City of AnaheimCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- People v. City of ReedleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Mangini v. Aerojet-General Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1991
- Venuto v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1971
- Rynsburger v. Dairymen's Fertilizer Cooperative, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1968
- Mohilef v. JanoviciCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Gelfand v. O'HAVERCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.