Legal Opinion

Roukovina v. Island Farm Creamery Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 17, 1924No. 24,115PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

The appeal is from a judgment perpetually enjoining defendant between the hours of 11 p. m. aud 6 a. m., daily, from operating an ice-crusher and from loading its milk wagons at the rear end of its place of business.

The evidence is not here, and the errors assigned must be confined, as they are, to the proposition that the findings of fact do not support the judgment.

The substance of' the findings material to a disposition of the case are: For several years prior to this suit, defendant had been in the milk, cream, dairy and ice-cream business in a two-story building fronting Third avenue, in…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Booth v. . R., W. O.T.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. Stevens v. Rockport Granite Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  3. Gilbert v. ShowermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Brede v. Minnesota Crushed Stone Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  5. Cunningham v. MillerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Muehlman v. KeilmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Warren Company v. DicksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  3. Ritz v. Woman's ClubWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Robinson v. WestmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  5. Bartlett v. MoatsSupreme Court of Florida · 1935

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API