Legal Opinion
In re Padilla
New York Court of Appeals
Decided June 3, 1986PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
These appeals put before us the question whether the Appellate Division can suspend attorneys pending consideration of disciplinary charges against them, where the suspensions are on notice and the orders are based on the attorneys’ admissions or other uncontroverted evidence of misconduct immediately threatening the public interest. We conclude that the Appellate Division has that power.
Lorenzo Padilla
In a report handed down during December 1982 in a case entitled New York Bank for Sav. v Padilla, a Special Referee concluded that appellant Lorenzo Padilla, then an…
3Cases cited16 opinions
- In re Accounting of Lincoln Rochester Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1974
- People Ex Rel. Karlin v. CulkinNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- In re ChuNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- In re LevyNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- In Re the Petition of KaufmannNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by12 opinions
- In Re Andres M. ArandaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
- In Re WarburghCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- In re GoldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- In re MurdockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- In re WechslerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.