In re Levy
New York Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
We hold that while an attorney convicted of a criminal offense may introduce evidence in mitigation and explanation in a subsequent disciplinary proceeding, he may not relitigate the issue of his guilt of the offense for which he was convicted.
Appellant attorney was convicted in Federal court of conspiracy to pay illegal kickbacks to a union welfare and pension official in violation of the United States Code (tit 18, §§ 371, 1954), a felony under Federal law. Thereupon disciplinary proceedings were instituted in the Appellate Division, First Department. It was recognized that the automatic…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- S. T. Grand, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- McGrath v. GoldNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Vavolizza v. KriegerNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Matter of DoneganNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- In re KahnNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- State Bar of Nevada v. ClaiborneNevada Supreme Court · 1988
- People v. PlevyNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- In re MitchellNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- In re ChuNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Merchants Mutual Insurance v. ArzilloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.