Legal Opinion
In re Gold
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 11, 2010PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*83OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
The Supreme Court of the State of New Jersey, by order filed April 22, 2009 (198 NJ 405, 968 A2d 711 [2009]), temporarily suspended the respondent from the practice of law in that state, and further ordered that all funds deposited in any New Jersey financial institution maintained by the respondent be restrained from disbursement, except on application to the New Jersey Supreme Court. New York State Office of Court Administration records disclose that the respondent maintains a law office located at 1 Piermont Avenue in Nyack.
The respondent was suspended in New Jersey…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- In re PadillaNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- In re GrayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- In re ConnollyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- In Re GoldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2009
4Cited by6 opinions
- Matter of BacottiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- In re GoldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- In re HummelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- In re HummelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Matter of MorrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.