Legal Opinion

In re Murdock

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 3, 1992PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondent was admitted to practice by this court in 1970 and maintains an office for the practice of law in Ticonderoga, Essex County.

Petitioner, the Committee on Professional Standards, moves for an order, pursuant to section 806.4 (f) of this court’s rules (22 NYCRR 806.4 [f]), suspending respondent pending consideration of disciplinary charges against him.

By petition dated February 28, 1992, respondent is accused of seven charges of professional misconduct, including converting client funds, failure to maintain complete records of client funds or of his attorney escrow account, failure to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re PadillaNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. In re BaltimoreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  3. Claim of Tallini v. MartinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re BishopAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  2. In re ElebyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. In re MurdockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  4. In re SchlesingerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  5. In re SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API