Legal Opinion

Allen v. Schultheiss

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided October 1, 2009No. 06-CV-1445PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUIZ, Associate Judge:

Appellant filed a complaint to quiet title and for ejectment against appellees, who were in possession of a parcel of real property, claiming that she had a life interest in it pursuant to a deed. The trial judge granted appellees’ motion for summary judgment after determining that the deed purporting to grant appellant an interest in the property was void because, as a matter of law, a life estate cannot be held as a tenancy by the entirety. 1 We hold that a life estate may be held as a tenancy by the entirety. We reverse the grant of summary judgment and remand the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Joyner v. Sibley Memorial HospitalDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Coleman v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
  3. Settle v. SettleCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1925
  4. In Re Estate of ChuongDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Gillespie v. WashingtonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Baltimore v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. 800 Water Street, Inc. v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API