Jones v. B. O.R.R. Co.

Opinion by

Keeler, J.,

The statement of questions involved, to .which .under our rules .our review on this appeal is limited, praises only one question, and that is whether .the defendant was entitled to a new trial because the verdict for the plaintiff was in excess of the amount which the evidence justified. Our decision is confined to this one point and must not be construed as passing upon any of .the other questions raised in the court below.

The action was in .trespass for (1) illegal distress and (2) excessive distress. The property levied upon consisted of buildings belonging to the…