Legal Opinion

Rossheim v. Bornot, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 9, 1932No. Appeals, 327 and 328PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Simpson,

As the result of a collision between a truck, operated for the corporation defendant, and an automobile, driven by the duly licensed minor plaintiff, the boy suffered serious injuries and his parents were put to expense in endeavoring to have him cured thereof. This occasioned the present suit, and, from the judgments in plaintiffs’ favor, defendant appeals and asks us to decide but a single point: Was the minor plaintiff guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law? In determining this, we must accept as true all the facts and proper inferences of fact,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Donnelly v. Public Service Commission & Pennsylvania R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  2. Connors v. DempseySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Brown v. Shirks Motor ExpressSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  2. St. John v. KeplerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  3. Wermeling v. SHATTUCKSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  4. Fisher v. Duquesne Brewing Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  5. Smith v. PachterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API